Chaos Cotrol Digizine

THE LATEST | ALL INTERVIEWS | NEWS BLOG | ABOUT CHAOS CONTROL | CONTACT

  1. The Melvins

    November 7, 2000 by admin

    Having at one point released a year-long series of monthly limited edition singles, The Melvins are no strangers to unusual release schedules. So it didn’t come as much of a surprise when they decided to release 3 new albums over the course of about a year.

    “We had no concept’ other than wanting to do a large project of very different sounding records,” explains vocalist/guitarist Buzz Osborne. “Unconventional is nothing new to us, I’ve always felt out of place in the music world with both fans and other bands.”

    The trilogy began last year with “The Maggot” and “The Bootlicker” and continues with the current “The Crybaby.” Of the first two installments, many fans have been surprised by “The Bootlicker” due to it’s clean sound and avoidance of distortion. One Internet fan review even went so far as to call it “‘heavy cocktail jazz.” According to Buzz, that disc was meant to be very different and is “what makes a trilogy of this nature work.” When asked what we can expect from the trilogy’s conclusion, the singer/guitarist promised a disc that would be “totally different in every way” from the others.

    The Melvins released their first album, “Gluey Porch Treatments” ” in 1987. Since then, they’ve switched bassists several times, moved from indie to major label and back, and even opened for Kiss (“The weirdness factor alone made the whole thing worth it, it was insane,” proclaims Buzz.) The current line-up consists of Buzz, drummer Dale C, and bassist Kevin Rutmanis (formerly of Cows).

    Currently, The Melvins record for Ipecac, a new record label started up by Mike Patton of Mr. Bungle (and formerly of Faith No More). It’s the second independent label the band has been on since recording 3 albums for Atlantic Records in the early 90′s. Although Buzz says that The Melvins’ time on a major label �was great,’ he always knew that they would eventually be back on an indie.

    “It worked out about like I expected, but I figured we would be dropped after only one album,” says Buzz about Atlantic. “I never thought we would sell millions of records in the first place so we conducted ourselves as such. Most bands on majors just want to be stars and do whatever it takes or whatever the label says to try to become one. There’s nothing worse than a band that tries to sell out and have it not work. They are left with nothing.”

    The Melvins may have never ended up on major label had it not been for the huge success of Nirvana, and the resulting rush of labels to sign up the next big �alternative’ band.

    “The whole Nirvana thing was just a smoke screen,” says Buzz. “They sold themselves the same way Motley Crue did. The only thing that was different was they said they were different. The majors were fooled for a moment but now they’re running scared. It will be a cold day in hell before a band like us gets signed again. Things have reverted back to the way they were about 88. That’s good news for us. People will have to search us out again.”

    And now that they’ve released their trilogy, what else will The Melvins try to avoid the standard cycle of releasing an album, touring, and the repeating the process the next year?

    “Maybe putting out blank CDs?,” says Buzz. “God only knows.”


  2. Steven Severin

    by admin

    When Siouxsie and the Banshees decided to split, did you have a clear idea of what you wanted to do next?

    Steven Severin : I knew I wanted time out, first & foremost & the arrival of my daughter, Sadie insured that! During that period I wrote articles for The Guardian newspaper & surfed a lot to see what was out there, what to avoid. My first album, Visions, was completed before the annoucement of the split so I pretty much knew which way I was headed. The last thing I wanted to do was form a new group….still don’t. The bass guitar has been in its case since the split.

    What attracted you to the idea of an internet-based label? If the internet didn’t exist, do you think you would have still started a label?

    Steven Severin : It’s so obviously “the future” and luckily it comes very naturally to me. I’ve owned a computer since 1983 and studied the technology in relation to music particularly since day one. For instance my next project will involve sending ‘work-in-progress” mp3′s via email to my collaborators to enable feedback within the same working day in the studio. I did have talks with Rough Trade & Blast First about releasing through them but I found the ‘indie’ way just as flaky as the ‘major’ way. I’d rather fuck it up myself!

    Is RE: TOTALLY internet-based, or can stores stock your cds if they want to?

    Steven Severin : Originally, it was mail-order only with my site as the only ‘shop’ but I soon realised I had to speed things up by using a distributor. I use CARGO for the UK & EC. I’ve yet to find an American distributor.

    Have you done anything with actual on-line distribution (selling MP3 files of songs)?

    Steven Severin : I ‘m eagerly watching which way this goes. I have a couple of ‘edited’ mp3′s on my site as previews but I’m thinking of creating a ‘club’ where old demos & rareties plus brand new unreleased material would be available for sale. At present the majority of mp3 sites offer up music that should never be allowed to see the light of day, but that’s the beauty of the Internet. Everyone’s a star.

    On-line digital distribution takes away the act of actually going to a music store and browsing through records/cds, and also might shift the focus away from Albums, as people can easily buy single tracks. How do you feel about this?

    Steven Severin : I think the album was an artist driven thing & then an industry thing. The public have always liked particular tracks and are wise to the fact that a CD costs less than a dollar so how can the industry justify selling an album @ �17.99 & a single @ �0.99? The compact disc may have saved the industry during the recession but it will eventually herald the death-knell. Personally I like albums as a conceptual thing and will continue to create in those terms. I like themes and creating the artwork to compliment a vision. In the same way as ‘pop’ people have consigned the “b-side” to the bin they will stop making albums of ‘filler’ material and just release four or five songs (well videos, really) each outing. It gives them more time for marketing & promotion which is the lodestone of ‘pop’ celebrity.

    Besides being an outlet for your music, what other functions does the RE: website serve? What are some of the things you’re planning on doing with it in the future?

    Steven Severin : It’s a 24 hour focus for what I do! It’s a much more personal presentation of the work than has ever been possible before. I think people feel more connected to my work as a result and that appears to be very important to them. Both touring and recording are unnaturally secluded endevours and as a result bands have no choice but to leave the ‘explanation’ & ‘definition’ of their work to record companies, journalists, broadcasters etc. – areas that are prey to the most vile forms of censorship, racism & sexism in the name of commerce. I see my website as a political statement as well as a place to indulge my perverse strategems!

    In plain terms I have an archive of FAQ’s, a gallery of images stolen from around the net that serve as pointers to my likes, dislikes and inspirations and a guestbook and discussion list for that ‘personal’ touch. I have plans aplenty for ‘web specific’ projects but time is against me as I am busy creating the ‘concrete’ work that forms my new solo life.

    Do you ever look around the internet to see what fans are saying about you (and Siouxsie and The Banshees)?

    Steven Severin : I lurk all the time! I think the most bizarre thing was seeing a Banshees “fan” wax lyrically about Eric Clapton!!! What did we do wrong? I’d have him put to the sword for crimes against music at the earliest opportunity. I only ‘de-cloak’ when some terrible misquote starts gaining too much creedence. Otherwise I just giggle to myself.


  3. Saint Etienne

    by admin

    Can you tell me about the EP?

    Pete: “It’s called ‘Places To Visit’ and it’s on Sub Pop. The last album, although it came out last year, was recorded like a year before, that pretty much. So it’s the first new stuff we’ve done for ages. It’s a bit more experimental than our last album, we’ve been sort of playing around. A lot of it was recorded at my house.”

    Compared to your past releases, “Good Humour” sounded less electronic and more cohesive as an album. Did you set out to make it sound different?

    Pete: “Yeah. We just wanted to do sort of a full-on pop album where every song could possibly be an A-side and it was the first time we’d really worked with a producer, as well. It was co-production.”

    What was it like working with a producer?

    Pete: “There were a few moments of tension, I’d say, but generally it was pretty good. Yeah, we had a few times where he just disappeared for like 5 hours after getting into a huff.”

    What made you decide to use a producer?

    Pete: “Just because we really wanted a particular sound. The songs were sort of .. the main influence was 70′s soul and 70′s singer/songwriter type stuff. And the instrumentation that we wanted … we’d done demos with synth and stuff where we’d use the same sort of sounds , like vibes and organs. But we really wanted the real instruments to be doing it this time. Because we had less experience doing that, we thought it would be good to get someone who really knew how to record those.”

    You describe ‘Places to Visit’ as being more experimental; is that a direction you see the band going with the next album?

    Pete: “We’ve started the next album already. We’re recording in Berlin and it’s kind of a hodge podge of elements. There will be quite a lot of live instruments, strings and drums and bass. But we’re bringing back more electronic stuff. It’s got a vaguely jazzy feel to it.”

    What’s the reason for the switch in US labels?

    Pete: “We’re still with Sub Pop at the moment, we were originally on Warner Bros. for quite a long time and then that sort of fell apart. The MCA thing was a one off, really, with ‘He’s On The Phone’. And then we signed with Sub Pop for the last album.”

    How do you feel about the gap between the UK and US release dates of ‘Good Humor’?

    Pete:“It wasn’t really intentional, it’s just one of those things. That’s why we did the extra disc with the first US batch, to make it a bit different.”

    Did you do any songs from the upcoming album when you toured recently?

    Pete: “Not this time around, the songs aren’t finished. We only really just started. We work in weird ways; that band who’s with us live hasn’t been with us in Berlin, so they haven’t heard the songs yet!”

    Will live instruments play a big role in the new album?

    Pete: “Yes, in Berlin we’ve been working with a band. But in Britain we’re going to be getting various members of our live band to play as well, and we’re going to get some string players. Putting millions of people on it in the end!”

    I know Sarah had a solo album come out between Saint Etienne releases; what were you up to?

    Pete:“We were running a label with EMI called Emidisc for a while. About a year. We also released a compilation, which involved some touring around Europe at that time. Just sort of various things, we seemed to be busy all the time.”

    What was the Emidisc experience like?

    Pete: “We were in the process of trying to sign lots of people, but we only signed two. A group called Kenickie and a group Denon. It was good, I really enjoyed it, but it was like working on the wrong side of the fence. I was meeting people and I felt like I’d suddenly become a suit! I was relieved we stopped doing it after a while.”

    Have you done any remixes lately?

    Pete: “We’ve done one recently for a group called Fugu. In the past, we’ve done stuff for groups like Pizzicoto Five.”

    There’s been quite a few remixes of Saint Etienne songs; do you have any favorites?


  4. Real Life

    by admin

    An interview with David Sterry of Real Life (“Send Me An Angel”, “Catch Me I’m Falling”)

    There was quite a gap between your last album and “Happy.” What has the band been up to?

    “The album previous to the one we have out now was called ‘Lifetime.’ We’ve always found ourselves in deep trouble with record companies in that we’re still trying to work out all the royalties and copyrights way back to ‘Send Me An Angel.’ It’s still a nightmare. When ‘Lifetime’ came out in 1990, we were with a record company called Curb Records. They were basically a country label but they had a strong alternative pop side. The first single off ‘Lifetime’ was a song called ‘God Tonight’ and it kind of stormed into the dance charts. It had become a crossover hit when all the alternative pop people left and we were stuck with the country and western side. We had to get out of that deal, it took two years to get out of it, where we had no releases. Also we were trying to fight through all that backlog of legal things with the original stuff. We just got grounded, we were so tied up in legalities that we couldn’t do a thing and then last year we decided to just be an independent band, post ourselves on the web, see if anyone wants to have anything to do with us, and make an album. So we made the ‘Happy’ album and it was kind of this release of energy and frustration, and a celebration of the fact that we’re still here. That’s it in a nutshell. It’s more complicated than that, but also boring. It’s still not sorted out, but at least we made a record and proved to ourselves that we’re still alive.”

    Is it mostly the same line-up as when you started?

    “Yeah, it’s 3 out of 4 originals. We’re on keyboard player number 4. We have kind of a Spinal Tap problem, they seem to explode at odd times. We have a new guy called George, and he was involved pretty much through most of the ‘Happy’ album. But other than that it’s been the same 3 stooges, me, Danny our drummer and Alan our bass player.”

    How does it differ now not being on a big label?

    “A lot of it’s all down to money, but there’s also a lot of freedom involved. When we made a record with a record company, they used to put us in a studio that would cost $3000 a day. We had to come up with a budget this time, but also recording has changed so much that people can really make a record in their bedroom these days if you’ve got a computer and a bit of software. So some of the stuff was recorded in a very small studio with a great engineer who was only like $40 an hour. Some of it was recorded in Danny our drummer’s bedroom where he had a 8-track reel to reel plus an old Atari computer running Qbase. But it all worked. I think we brought the album in at $12,000 or something, which would be about $8000 American dollars. That’s mastering, art work, the works. And we’re thinking we could get it done cheaper next time. We’re going to start recording direct to hard disk. We were totally in control of what we were doing. I feel that we’ve learned enough from the previous records to work independently. We know what we want to hear. We don�t need to bring someone else in to find that we want to hear.”

    How does it affect the creative process?

    “I think it makes you a lot more spontaneous. If you’re signed to a major label, they’d want you to do demo the songs in the studio. And quite often, the demo has just got a much better feel to it, there’s something very special about it. When you’re recording at home, you’re always starting with what’s going to be the finished product. So I think that you catch things more immediately. You can jump out of bed and turn on the computer and put down your idea.”

    Would you ever go back to being on a major label?

    “I honestly can’t see it. My experience with major labels has been, even when we’ve had a hit record and been popular, is that they’re all smiles and handshakes and hellos. But they’re full of shit basically. But with a smaller independent label, Momentum, who found us on the internet, it’s just 2 guys who’ve got no money but have worked so much harder and achieved more for us than any of the majors have. And when you walk out the door from a major label, the next act is walking in to do the handshakes and the smiles and a butt-kissing. So with this independent label, they spend a dollar, to make it back, they’ve got to really work hard. We’re commited, it’s much more of a true team effort. We feel obliged to really try to write something that they can sell, rather than go ‘oh well, it’s a label and they’ve got piles on money so it doesn’t matter’.”

    “Going back to being an independent band, we only answer to ourselves, and we’re only responsible for ourselves. If something’s wrong, we blame ourselves. On other tours, we’ve had management, record company people, and we just sit around getting grumpy because there’s nothing to do. With this one, we’ve been busy. We’re taking turns driving, we’ve driven close to 5000 miles in America over 2 1/2 weeks. We’ve been responsible for hotels, flights, equipment, and I think we’re happier doing that. We’ve been working the whole time, and I think that’s good for us.”

    Was it difficult playing live back when the band started, since electronic instruments play a big part in your sound and the technology was as advanced then?

    “Yeah, it was. When we first started there was no sampler you could get cheaply. You had to have a Fairlight or an Emulator. The first Emulator then cost me $12,500. They’re now worth $500 in a pawn shop! Also, Real Life are kind of like a three piece rock group with keyboards. So we use a sequencer but we play most of it as live as we possible can. We’ve often had a bass guitar that controls a synthesizer. We used to have more keyboards, and a six foot high rack of modules. Now we’re down to one keyboard that does everything, all the sequencing, all the sounds. So it’s a lot easier. We have a very normal looking drum kit that has triggers in it, so we can trigger all sorts of other sounds. Then we have the guitar and bass guitar. It’s a whole lot easier, all our gear just goes with us on the plane.”

    What do you think of all the 80′s bands who are reuniting and going on tour?

    “I think its good. It seems to be that the 80′s were the only era where the people weren’t supposed to move on. If you’re a 60′s band, likes the Stones or The Beatles, you’re allowed to go into the 70′s and 80′s and do whatever you want. But I don’t understand this thing about 80′s bands that are supposed to be stuck there. When that 80′s stuff first started happening, when TV first started happening, the question was is technology ruining your music, do you have anything to do with your music, is video more important? And I think that’s proven to be the rubbish that it was when it was said in the first place. So what is people had funny haircuts and make up? It was a great era, people have so much fondness for that era and the great pop music. I wonder how the 90′s are going to be looked at? All the grunge bands. Some of them brilliant, some of them sounded pretty laughable even back then. With all the bands getting back together, I think that people are dusting themselves off and saying ‘I didn’t feel like I was finished, I feel like I still want to develop that a little bit further. Even the nostalgia shows, even if they were to just go to Las Vegas and play I’d still love to see half those bands over a lot of the new bands around.”

    You said your current label found you over the Internet. In what other ways have you found the Internet useful?

    “It’s a great way of bypassing radio and television. Radio is always the toughest nut to break. It’s a format thing, it’s more intent on making money than breaking new acts. Everywhere in the world there are stations that will only play old hits, so then where are the new hits going to come from? So the internet allows you to bypass that and get you directly to fans. They can hear new stuff, that they might be able to go find in the record shops, they can order over the Internet, you can have a weekly newsletter that goes out, we can put up photos. It’s one of those things you�ve got to maintain, otherwise people get bored and won’t come back. We feel like we have this ongoing communication with people that buy our records and we don’t have to worry about whether a radio station will play us. The people who want to know about us are very aware of what we’re doing.

    How long has “Happy” been out?

    “It’s been out for over a year, but it’s one of those things no one knows about so it’s still a new record. There’s a pile of people that it hasn’t gotten to. We think it’s a very good record, and so does our record company. The problem being taking it to radio in America you’ve got to hire an independent company, and they’ll say’ ok, you want this on the radio, it will cost you $70,000′ and they’ll do it but we don’t have that kind of money.”

    What’s in the immediate future for the band?

    “We’re going backto start working on a new album. We don’t ever want to have the kind of 7 year timelapse again. We just want to be able to release, tour, release, tour, keep going”

    Why was “Send Me An Angel” re-released in the late 80′s?

    “It started out as my dumb idea, and in so many ways I regret it. At that time, there was lot of remixes coming out, for instance, my all-time favorite song is “Blue Monday,” the Quincy Jones remix. And I’ve never really liked the sound of “Angel,” I wanted it to sound like Trevor Horn produced it. I always cringe when I hear it. So I said “let’s do a remix.’ I just wanted it to go to club djs, but they saw dollar signs in their eyes and put it out as though it was a new single. I was embarassed, quite frankly. It’s a great song, but I would have chosen that not to happen.”


  5. Moev

    by admin

    A decade after their last release, Vancouver-based electronic band MOEV are finally back. While their new ep “Suffer” showcases an updated sound for the band, it still very much keeps to the style of classic MOEV. Fans of dark synth pop with a slightly aggressive edge will not be disappointed by the new cd.

    The current MOEV line-up consists of:
    Tom Ferris-keyboards, programming
    Drew Maxwell- guitar, programming, vocals
    Julie Ferris- vocals, lyrics
    Kelly Cook- bass
    Cal Stephenson- keyboards, programming, vocals

    How did the reformation of Moev come about?

    TOM FERRIS : After Dean died, I wanted a change of musical scenery so I started Econoline Crush. The vocalist basically took over the band, taking it down a road that was incredibly predictable and weak. After a few live shows, I realized I was trapped inside a cheesy Canadian rock show and I had to get out. It made me realize how much I missed the creativity and artsyness that has always been part of Moev. My wife Julie and I had been writing for years off and on, and slowly it began to sound more and more like Moev. Not just the sound, but the way we were approaching everything. Cal Stephenson (also an original member) and I, reunited out of our mutual hatred of Nettwerk, started writing together again and soon the songwriting started to intertwine. I found a band on the internet called Redshifted and thought they sounded how I had wanted Econoline Crush to sound. I contacted them and “them” turned out to be Drew Maxwell. We asked him to play guitar on the ep, and he flew up here from Charlotte, North Carolina for three days to record. A couple of months later, he moved to Washington State to be close enough to us to work on music.

    What are your goals with the current incarnation of the band? For example, do you see it as a long-term, full-time venture, or an occasional thing?

    TOM FERRIS : Absolutely full time .

    What are the backgrounds of the new members?

    TOM FERRIS : Julie used to write with Daryl Kromm of Strange Advance, and this was the demo she showed me when we first met. Drew was Redshifted, doing all the programming, vocals, guitar, bass and production himself.

    Musical technology has evolved quite a bit over the past decade; what effect has this had on the way Moev works?

    TOM FERRIS : It’s made us totally self-sufficient. I can’t ever see going into a studio again.

    Did you have a definite idea of how you wanted the “Suffer” cd to sound, or did you just start writing/recording to see were it wold take you?

    TOM FERRIS : Suffer was an experiment to see where our strengths and weaknesses were. The new full length record is sounding a bit more rounded because Drew and Cal are in it from the beginning.

    What are some of the major changes you see in the music industry compared to when Moev started, and when the last Moev release came out?

    TOM FERRIS : The internet is the biggest change because its given power back to the artists which is a great thing. On the downside, record companies are still signing vacuous crap and for the most part, still have no real vision of what is new and interesting.

    When can we expect a new full-length album? Will you be touring at all?

    TOM FERRIS : By the summer of 2000. We will tour if we find ourselves in the right situation.

    Nettwerk was originally started up to release Moev’s music – are you currently involved with them at all?

    TOM FERRIS : They are only interested in promoting elevator music.


  6. Jimmy Somerville

    by admin

    Jimmy Somerville was first heard from as part of 80′s synth-pop trio Bronski Beat (“Smalltown Boy”). After leaving that band, he went on to the equally excellent The Communards before launching a solo career. His new CD, “Manage The Damage” is out now on Instinct Records.

    On “Manage The Damage” you worked with Sally Herbert, formerly of Banderas. How did that collaboration come about?

    “Well, we live together and have known each other forever. So one day we thought we’d have a bit of fun and thought ‘oh, this is cool.’ So we decided to put a collection of songs together and see what happens.”

    What was it like working together on music?

    “The most amazing thing for us was that we did it at home. We were in control, we were doing it at out own leisure, in our own environment. It was more secure and relaxed. It’s a kind of low-key album in a sense, it’s kind of mellow, really. It’s not too in your face and manic. So for me at least lyrically that’s where I was at. We were just kind of finding our feet in terms of how we would actually work together. The next project I think will be definitely more adventurous, energy-wise, that’s for sure.”

    What made you do the album at home?

    “Well first of all budget, because it was on a smaller independent label. We had something like 40,000 pounds to do the album, and that’s not a lot of money. So we thought, what’s point of spending it on studios? The state of the art ones cost like 1000 pounds a day. Technically, we were not very good, really. We had to bring in some people to help us out because technically we weren’t that competent and were just finding our way around. Creatively, we were really into it and were experimenting as well. So it was a learning process.

    “It was quite exciting that we were doing it at home. You’re not thinking what the studio is costing, when you think you’ve really got to put something together and you end up with something that you’re not really completely sure of or satisfied with but there’s no going back, because that’s going to be another 1000 pounds or something. So that starts to take over. On this album, some of the tracks we came back to 6 months later and thought ‘hmm, that’s not right, this can change, so let’s do it’. So that’s what was really great about this process!”

    Are there any disadvantages to working at home?

    “It depends on how technically clinical you want it sound. Anyone who works in the music industry knows that the technology is there to turn probably your pet pig into a singing sensation. There’s that kind of thing that we probably missed out on, the state of the art technology. But in the end, I think it comes down to the fact that I can sing and I don’t need the technology. We’re quite competent as song writers and musicians.”

    Besides recording at home, how is it different not being on a major label now?

    “Well it’s a completely different ball game, and money is the issue. You don’t have that kind of budget because these small companies just can’t afford to pay lots of money to do things. Which is kind of good, the only drawback is possibly the promotion, because you’re up against some of the big guns who can push and push the artists until they finally break through. This way, it’s breaking through purely though the talent that you have and the sound that you’ve created. And that can be very difficult, especially if you’re up against other major labels that are pushing and pushing and pushing. Sadly, some artists don’t have any talent but they’ve got the money behind them. It’s really difficult, and I think that the awful thing is that in rock it’s perfectly acceptable to be in your mid 30′s and your early 40′s etc, but if you’re in pop it’s almost as if there’s this unwritten law that says ‘thou shall not make pop if you’re over 35.’ And I think that’s awful, that’s such nonsense.”

    Was it that way when you started out in the 80′s?

    “No, I think there was much more room to do pop if you were kind of older. Definitely. Pop always had been about youth, in a sense, but there was never any kind of ….. the way is now, there are kinds of rules within radio. Especially in the UK. On Radio One, which is the national station and if they don’t play your record you’re kind of doomed from the beginning, they do have an agenda that is ‘nothing before 1990′ and not playing older artists. It’s really difficult.”

    When you were on major labels, did you ever have any problems with losing creative control?

    ‘Yeah, you make so many compromises on the major labels. There’s certain songs that given a choice I never would have done. But i never felt confident enough to say no. That’s why in the end I did leave London Records, because I thought ‘I don’t want to keep doing this, having these fights and a constant battle about what I should and shouldn’t be doing’. I want to do what feels right for me, regardless of any commercial success. If it’s right for me and I’m creating it, then that’s the issue.”

    Since you have a home studio, do you find yourself constantly doing music now?

    “Not really. I’ll spent a long time not making any music. When this album was finished, I didn’t really do anything at all for maybe six or seven months. But now Sally and myself are starting to get excited about doing things, because we keep coming to each other will little ideas. That’s when I know I’m in a process when I want to start being creative. But it’s not something I live for. Because all of my early career was something that just happened, so it wasn’t a big deal for me. I was just doing it all for like a laugh almost, I was just having fun and not actually understanding what I was actually involved with. So that was kind of bizarre for me.”

    At want point did you start thinking about music as your career?

    “I think really round about ‘Read My Lips,’ the album for London Records. I was really involved in AIDS activism and Act Up in the UK and then suddenly I really realized that I had a passion for singing about what I feel and think. That when I suddenly realized those songs really meant something to me. There are songs obviously in the past as well, on previous albums, that do mean something to me and are really important. But suddenly I just realized that gosh, this is what I do, this is my job, my career now.”

    What do you think of 80′s retro being cool now?

    “In some respects, it’s kind of funny. I can’t complain, really, because it’s given a new audience access to things I’ve done in the past. But for me personally, there are very few pop songs and pop artists today who write songs themselves about who they are and what they are doing . There’s very few pop songs that are done in that tradition of story telling or a time and a place. And I believe that’s what I do, and that’s what I’ve done from the beginning. It’s been like a chronicle of my life, and the life of, a lot of the time, gay men and the people that surrounded me. So when something like ‘Smalltown Boy’ or “Why’ is on a compilation now and there’s like some college kids in Idaho or something who buy a compilation and they hear this and it clicks with them what this is about … to me that’s special, that’s really special. I still get letters every week from kids from all over the place who have just discovered these songs and they tell me ‘I can’t believe you did these songs so long ago, these songs are about being gay and about life,etc’ and they tell me how the songs are so special to them. I just think that’s a great thing, and that’s what makes me keep wanting to relay some kind of social comment along the way.”

    Why did you think much of today’s pop music doesn’t do that?

    “I think that’s just how we perceive pop now, and that’s how I think the industry expects pop to work. It’s not about anything other than a purely commercial moment that’s going to create hopefully for them a lot of revenue. It’s really kind of sad. I think there are a few people who can come through that, but they’re very few and far between. Usually the kind of artists who tend to maybe try to express something about their lives and what they do tend to be more of an alternative sounding kind of artist. Someone like Beck. But you don’t get the Becks in pure pop, and to have that combination would to me be fantastic. If people just loved a melody and suddenly also hear a great lyrics or thought.

    How influenced are you by music that you hear?

    “It’s kind of strange, because when I was working on this album was listening to a lots more kind of low key and subtle music. But at the same time I always say that and then realize I was listening to from Donna Summer and Nancy Sinatra and Lee Hazelwood to Beck to Les Rythmes Digitales to Kraftwerk to Daft Punk. So I listen to just anything. I’m so eclectic in what I listen to, and I think that really influences me.”

    Bronski Beat were pretty pioneering in their use of synths – how has the evolution of musical technology since that time affected the way you work?

    “I think everyone assumes Bronski Beat was just purely electronic, and yet bizarrely we used choirs, we used strings, we used horns. We were very much a combination of synthesized and very much acoustic sounds. We always said we would never use purely synthetic strings, and I would never do that in my solo work, because I think it’s criminal. Also synthetic horns, I think that’s criminal. There’s something about strings and horns that you cannot replicate, and the sounds that you get electronically are maybe ok, but to combine that sound with a real one is just fantastic!”

    Do you focus more on UK or overseas markets and audiences?

    “My visibility in the UK, compared to places like Europe, is just nonexistent. It’s really bizarre for me. In the UK no one really cares if I put on a show or not, whereas somewhere like Germany, we just did PA gig in Dresden and there was like 3000 people and it was sold out. It’s very different there for me.”

    What are your PA performances like? Do you use backing tapes?

    “We use a DAT, and then there’s myself Gillian and Matthew. In a sense it’s more than a PA, we don’t have dancers, everything is focused on our voices. Matthew and Gillian, who I work with, together our voices are so strong. It’s more than just singing to a backing tape, it’s more of an emotional thing. People are always really amazed at how we sound vocally.”

    Do you focus on the new material? Do you do any songs from your previous bands?

    “I do various things, old things and new things and things that I’ve never really recorded.”

    What do you think of the internet and the effects it’s having on the music industry?

    “I things it’s good, and if anything I think the record industry has brought it upon themselves. Because they have refused to recognize that there is such an incredible sea of talent and creative people out there. They’re only interested in having a good package, regardless of whether the person can really sing that song. I think it must be awful if you have really a great voice but maybe you’re a bit overweight to be on the pages of these magazines that like to have this glamour look. That’s awful, because you have the talent and you’re a great songwriter but they only want a visual thing. That’s where the Internet comes into it, because it gives people who are outsiders but have talent the opportunity.”

    How do you feel about it allowing people to buy individual tracks, rather than just full albums or designated singles?

    “Yeah, because in the end we all like to make up our own compilations. Usually if you do buy an album you’re guaranteed that you’re not going to like every track on it. But what always amazed me is when people buy and album from an artist, and these artists have lots of commercial success and it’s based on one single. And everyone will buy this album, but the rest of it is kind of shit really apart from this one single. But people have been doing that for decades, and I don’t get it! it’s still the same old story, so this idea of individual tracks, I think it’s good. But it also means that this whole idea of musicians as multimillionaire celebrities is kind of like maybe going to come to an end. But I don’t think it will, there’s always going to be a gullible public who are just buying into that stuff. In the end, the music industry isn’t just about selling music, it’s about selling stars. It seems like to me people will always want celebrities and stars.”