Chaos Cotrol Digizine

THE LATEST | ALL INTERVIEWS | NEWS BLOG | ABOUT CHAOS CONTROL | CONTACT

  1. W.A.S.P.

    November 7, 1999 by admin

    An interview with Blackie Lawless of W.A.S.P.

    How has W.A.S.P. benefited from the internet?

    “Well, that’s something that I’m enthusiastic about. Because what I like is the idea of being able to, as i refer to it, network people together. It gives you a better sense in trying to keep your finger on the pulse of what’s going on out there. Because, you know, everything has changed with the advent of media, not just web sites, even though that’s accelerated it. It’s like, to give you an example, in the old days I can remember going to shows that would have been the equivelent of say, W.A.S.P., Eagles, Sarah McLachlan all on the same bill. While nowadays, the subcultures are even more defined into specific niche packages. And what something like these websites do is, from the consumer’s point of view, it’s almost like they can pick and choose more precisely exactly what they’re looking for. It’s almost made to order nowadays.”

    Do you like to keep track of what fans are saying about you?

    “Yeah, I do. As far as the difference between if i’m looking for positive and negative responses … not like that. I’m just trying to get an idea of what people are thinking in general. Because, if somebody doesn’t like something, trying to convert them is a difficult thing. So I guess what I’m trying to say is that I’m not looking at it from an egotistical point of view, trying to look for acceptance or rejection one way or the other. I just want an idea of what people say, what they’re really thinking. Because when you do an online chat or something like that, they ask different questions than journalists do. It’s more like taking it directly to the source. To be honest with you, I’d imagine that there’s some performers out there that would look at something like that, especially what I’ve been trying to create with this network situation, with the different web sites, and say well, why would I want to be bothered with something like that? But in reality, if you think about it, it’s the perfect way to have a sit down any time you want almost. How can you ask for better market surveys than that? It’s like a dream come true.”

    You’ve had a fairly long career. Have you seen major changes in the way the music industry works?

    “Major to the point of catastrophic. There are no musical people that run major labels anymore. They’re all lawyers. I’m continually … amazed is not the word …. dumfounded is more like the way I feel. How can someone run a business if they don’t know anything about the business? It’s the kind of thing that when someone gets fired from a job, they can go down the street and get a job doing the same thing they got fired for. I don’t get it. It makes no sense to me.”

    What’s it like being on CMC? They seem to be focusing on older rocks bands who used to be on larger labels.

    “That’s exactly what they do. They’re taking bands that either couldn’t be on major labels anymore, or in our particular case are having …. let’s just say difference of opinion with the label we were on and what we were going to do and how we were going to be marketed. Because the problem with a lot of the majors now is that they don’t know how to sell these kinds of records to the kids. They have this blanket sort of mentality as to where they’re going to go with it, and if it doesn’t fit into that particular vein of marketing, then they don’t know what to do with it. So what good does it do you to be in a situation like that? CMC has clout because of BMG, so it’s almost like it’s … maybe what like Chrysalis might have been to EMI a long time ago. I wouldn’t say its boutique oriented, but it’s smaller to the point where at least you get a better handle of how to direct things and you don’t get caught up in all the beurocracy that you do with a major.”

    When you tour, what type of cross section do you get in terms of new fans and people who’ve been following the band all along?

    “It’s been two years since we’ve been on the road, and I’ve learned in the last 6 or 7 years that it’s going to change from year to year. So I really couldn’t give you an accurate response as to what the ratio is.”

    What can we expect from the upcoming tour?

    “To be honest with you, we really don’t know until we get into rehearsals. A lot of times it’s like the best laid plans of mice and men .. you say you’re going to do something and you don’t and then there ends up being this misinformation. So, those kind of things we usually play pretty close to the vest.”

    You’re touring Europe first – will you be doing US shows after that?

    “We’re going to do all the open air festivals over there this summer, then come back here at the end of July and then we’ll go out and do North America in July and August.”

    You’ve said that “Helldorado” is closer to what the band was like before getting signed than any other album has been. So what made the band change in the meantime?

    “The word that i use is ‘relaxed’. I’m more relaxed now than i’ve been probably ever, even before we got a record deal. We were more relaxed before we got a record deal, and I think every band is because even though they vow they won’t succumb to the pressure, no matter how belligerent and adamant you are that you’re not going to let it affect you, it ends up reflecting in the work whether you want it to or not and after you’ve been doing it for a while, you get to the point where you say, ok, i’m secure financially, emotionally and spiritually, who am I? And when you can … it’s almost like …. you’ve got to get ….I wouldn’t say deep inside yourself with meditation or anything like that, it’s just relaxing to the point where the peripheral things that would have caused you to make decisions in the past are no longer there. And when you can clear all that away, the real you comes out at that moment. Because the real you could change from day to day, week to week, and we’ve always made records based on instinct and emotion and the moment that we’re in. So it’s pretty clear … if you go back and look through our career, you can see who we were and what we were thinking just by picking up any piece of work along the way.”

    Were you able to try any of the material out live before recording the album?

    “No. we’ve learned in the past that it’s helpfull, but that’s a luxury that once you get a record deal you just don’t have anymore. It’s just one of those occupational hazards.”

    What are you feelings on censorship, and the “Parental Advisory” labels your music gets?

    “Our record was the first one to get a sticker. We were a poster child for that thing a long time ago and we could probably make gospel records and still get those on our records. I think it’s just going to follow me forever.”

    Do you thing the warning labels are necesary? I mean, should children not listen to W.A.S.P.?

    Well, it’s like this whole Littleton situation. Those kids are about a hundred hooks short of being real people. It’s like if the parents gave them a little more attention, they wouldn’t be having these problems. Anytime anyone ever goes back …. and don’t I mean listening to 20/20 or ‘Nightline’ where they’re asking ‘why? why? why’ .. all you have to do is go interview their friends. The friends always say the same story every time, they were unwanted. There is your answer right there. It’s the whole scapegoat situation.”

    You have a fanclub, W.A.S.P. Nation, and an extensive array of merchandise. What made you want to get into that?

    “Well, what I was looking to do was create a unique situation, something to take it to a level that had never been done before and to try and create, for lack of a better word and i’m not ashamed to use it, a cult. I really like that situation, and back to the niche orientation, where if you know who your real fans are, and we’ve been really blessed because we’ve had an enourmously dedicated fan base for a long time that is not like a regular fan base. They’re unique in the sense that they’re unbelievebly dedicated. And I would say that making a statement like Gratefull Dead-esque isn’t too far off the mark. I’m interested in seeing if that can be taken to another level to create a global type of unity.”

    “Now, as far as the merchanndising goes, we did a couple of conventions that were W.A.S.P conventions. We did them in New York over the last couple of years, it’s similar to what KISS did. And the merchandise we saw coming in there was pretty sobering. What we saw … I mean because of the nature of the band, because of who we are and the things that we’ve done, it’s not just t-shirts. I mean, I’ve seen people walk around with gold records and dolls and paintings. It’s just at a whole different level now. So we look at it, and a lot of it is pretty bad. So we said, ok, if there’s a market for this out there, and people are going to be walking around with this stuff …. it’s kind of like when people do bootleg t-shirts and stuff like that, they’re really bad quality and they fall apart 3 days after the people wash them. But for some reason those people think that the band’s in the back of the bus printing those shirts. Even though we’re not. We’re still going to get blamed for it if something goes wrong. So we said ok, if that’s the case, why don’ t we give them what they’re really looking for? Call it naivety if you want, but it wasn’t until we did those conventions that we realized that the fan base was at a whole different level. I collect sports memorabilia, and the stuff I look for is … i’m not particularly interested in baseball, I’m interested in taking a piece of whatever i can get from that athlete. And obviously the audiences are more sophisticated and are looking for the same things as well. So we thought instead of buying junk out there …. you know someone coming to me with a guitar that I’ve supposedly autographed and it looks more like Stevie Wonder did the signature, you know. And these people are just getting ripped off and you’ve got to look at them and say ‘I’m sorry, this ain’t real,’ It’s a funky situation, so hey, why not control it if you can? And I don’t know if we can. But a lot of this is just a big experiment at this point.”

    Do you notice any major differences between American and European audiences?

    “Well, i think when we’re at the shows, the audience reacts much the same. But I think the biggest difference is in the culture, in the sense that Europe, because it’s older is more traditional, while America is more trend-oriented. I mean American attention span ain’t that big.”


  2. The Creatures

    by admin

    Initially, The Creatures was a side project for Siouxsie and the Banshees members Siouxsie Sioux and Budgie. But now that the Banshees have called it a day, The Creatures is the duo’s primary musical venture. By forming their own label, Sioux Records, the group is striving to do everything on their own terms, avoiding any kind of external record label interference. The Creatures have set up their own web site, http://www.thecreatures.com/, to sell their music and keep fans informed. Last summer, the group toured America with the Velvet Underground’s John Cale, who previously had worked as producer on Siouxsie and the Banshees’ “The Rapture.” Siouxsie and Budgie recently released the long-awaited third Creatures album, “Anima Animus,” and are currently on the road supporting it. The following is a telephone interview with Budgie from January, 1999.

    How did the US tour with John Cale go last summer?

    “I suppose it took us a little bit by surprise. We hadn’t been there since ’95 with the Banshees. And of course it wasn’t just a Creatures show, it was a collaboration with John Cale. So it was a different way of going about it for us. I was sitting on the kit for John’ songs as well as our own, interchanging parts. It was very different, but a really responsive audience all the way around the states”

    You also worked with John Cale on the last Siouxsie and the Banshees album – how did you meet him initially?

    “I think we just asked him if he’d come along and help us finish the Banshees album. We’d met him briefly before that. We’d obviously been admirers of his solo work as well as the Velvet Underground. We met him briefly backstage when the Velvet Underground played Paris Olympia. But we had a mutual friend in Paris. It was when John was doing a ballet based on the life of Nico. We went along to Rotterdam to see the premiere of that. And he suggested that we get together and write a song especially for a thing he was doing in Rotterdam with one of the Dutch orchestras. That was broadcast live on Dutch television, the video found its way back to the west coast, to John’s agent in LA, and she decided to put the word out that this might be an interesting proposition for promoters around America. It’s a different way of looking at us both, really.”

    How extensive was the tour you did together?

    “It was about 30 dates over about seven weeks. We were hoping to get down to some of our favorite places, like Atlanta, Georgia and Houston. We didn’t get down to Texas. But it was quite extensive, we did California, through Salt Lake City, Las Vegas. We’d been to Vegas but had never played there before in any capacity. That was a first. We always like to try to do something we’ve never tried before. And I suppose what was different really was, for instance, in Seattle, we were playing 2 nights in a small place. The audience was passing us drinks, somebody stole my drum sticks so I was trying to play the cymbals in time. So it was the interaction, even if it wasn’t in time, that was a good laugh!”

    At what point did Siouxsie and the Banshees end? Did you know “The Rapture” would be your last album as you were making it?

    “I think we always say that you kind of approach everything as if it’s going to be the last time you’re going to do it. Because you hope it’s the best you can achieve. I think the last Banshee’s album was a hard event. It wasn’t as free flowing as we would have liked it to be. Siouxsie had always maintained that when it became a chore … it’s not always easy, and the friction a healthy thing, but I think it became apparent that there were tensions within the set-up of the band and behind the scenes that were basically getting in the way of what was good about the band. Too much interference from the pressure of commerce. I don’t think we were ready to give up that much, to make that many compromises. I think we just decided it was time to call it a day. Not particularly to start the Creatures project full-time, but that we shouldn’t keep at this if it’s not feeling right. It’s the hardest thing in the world to stop something that you’ve put so much love, care and attention into.”

    Has the creative process changed at all now that The Creatures is your main project?

    “The actual writing and the ways the ideas come about hasn’t changed. We never have been the type of writers, with the Creatures or as the Banshees, that kind of, say, finish up a whole bunch of lyrics and then mold them into a verse/chorus type thing. Or, on the other hand, we’re not the type of people who sit down and make music and then put words to it. It’s usually one kind of strange angular noise, or one set of words, that sparks off an idea that we’ll play around with. Just looking for a kind of whole statement, rather than a recognizable song chorus, if you like. The difference now, with the new album of Creatures material, is that the Creatures is the thing we do now. It’s not like an interim stage between Banshees albums. On “Boomerang,” we felt that we had to get everything out there because we wouldn’t be returning to it for a while. It’s a very hands on approach, we have our set-up in our house and I’d be banging drums and Siouxsie would be kind of singing the song as she walked through the door. It’s quite spontaneous and quite crazy.”

    What made you start up Sioux Records?

    “We did it, really, so we could send out Christmas cards this year with Sioux Records on them. That’s one of the main reasons why we did it. And of course we realized after we’d done the bulk of the recording and we were still hitting bricks walls and people were not quite sure of what we could do with this album, that it wasn’t because they knew better than us. It was because they, being the major records labels and to some degree the people who were called independent records labels … everybody seems to be very conservative with what they’re prepared to put their name to, or their voice to, or the financial backing to. I suppose we were just through with taking other people’s advice and opinions on what should be or shouldn’t be released as a CD. So we just thought that it’s about time we tried to do this completely on our own terms and get rid of the kind of commercial conformity. So through chance meetings, meetings of kindred sprits, we’ve got some good allies now. It feels very positive, very healthy.”


  3. Soul II Soul

    by admin

    An interview with Jazzie B

    How has the Soul II Soul website been working out? Are you directly involved with it?

    “That’s been up for about three years. No, I’m actually notthat hands-on in terms of information going in and out. We have somebody who specifically looks after that. But its been incredibly active, particularly the merchandising.”

    Have you considered using it to sell music on-line?

    “Yeah, we have. We’re in the process of talking to I think virgin.co.uk, who have been looking to develop it into the next stage. That is something we’re seriously considering.”

    How do you feel about on-line music distribution?

    “Well, as far as I’ve been told, by numerous people, it shouldn’t have too much of an adverse effect. I think it’s a fantastic way to go, as long as all the bits and pieces are ironed out. I think it’s fab. Particularly now, most people are moving in that way in regards to being computer literate. Particularly the younger kids and stuff like that. I’m all for it, actually.”

    Do you think it might cause the focus to shift away from albums, since people would be able to buy individual songs?

    “‘Yes, but to be honest with you, it’s been the situation of late when you have … I remember going to my local record shop, standing in there for hours. That was part of buying records. Those mom and pop stores don’t exist anymore. You don’t have that rapoire with the person across the counter. You go into the bigger shops now and they don’t even know what you’re talking about anymore. So you’ve lost all that anyway. Most people, when they buy an album, sometimes it is for one particular track. So I think it’s just a great idea. At one of my night clubs actually we have a machine, just as a trial at the moment, which has a whole array of artists. The device is called the Music Pod. It has a monitor, then a Mini Disc recorder, and then it has a whole .. I’m not sure how many titles, but there’s a whole bunch in there. You can download and make your own Mini Disc or even CD. From the clubs, looking at how that’s been going, there’s been a great bunch of interest. So this is something that I believe will catch on. Plus, I’m not sure about America, but compilations seem to be the biggest selling thing anyway here. From a consumers point of view, they’re getting the kinds of songs that they want immediately, as opposed to being in the stores and shopping like that.”

    Why re-release “Club Classics Volume One” now?

    “I had nothing to do with me, can you believe that? I’m sitting over here in the UK and someone phones up and says ‘hey Jazzie, how about re-releasing yoru old album?’ and at first I was ‘get away, it’s ten years old, my hairs longer and much more grayer, I’ve got five other albums, why the hell couldn’t you release one of them?’ It was really like one of those types of scenarios. It was all their idea, but as a matter of fact it’s been quite interesting getting a response from a lot of people. Particularly people in Europe and the UK who’ve purchased it and re-purchased it, and for some people it’s quite new. Again, we called this album ‘Club Classics’ and it really was about it being a classic. Some of those tracks, you listen to them today and they sound just as fresh as they did when we first put them out. In hindsight, it was a good idea.”

    Did you have any input in the selection of bonus songs?

    “No, those again were done by Virgin. They made suggestions about doing this that and the other and I was like ‘ah, cool , it’s all good’.”

    “Our lingo in this country is completely different from your lingo. I can remember vividly in the 80′s being there, and because we’d called it ‘Club Classics,’ due to that period of time they didn’t want it pigeon holed as a club record. Because in America, you’re very distinct about your categories and your genres. In the early years here, we had only one category, which was music. Now we’ve gone over to the America way of thinking, by having urban charts and dance charts and R&B charts and pop chart and all these other charts. It’s just really confusing. That’s why there was a different title for the album in America.”

    What are the pros and cons to having a rotating line-up?

    “Well, it’s all that I’ve known, really. We kind of established our own little style, our own little kind of institute, developing acts. Because at the time we started doing it, it was really a new thing. The club music during that period of time just wasn’t given the light of day unless it came out on a major label. It was very difficult for black acts to get across to the major labels as well. So we had our own idea based on what our club and our social life was about. Giving out a hand to another person, etc,etc. Which is why we did it in that kind of way. So the pros and cons of it, it’s all I’ve really understood in terms of helping to launch other people’s careers. And I guess the whole idea about the eclectic magic, what happens when people get together like that.”‘

    How do you tend to meet up with the people you collaborate with?

    “It’s a combination of both things. Sometimes I could be out in a club doing whatever and people approach me with tapes or ideas. Or I could be in someone else’s environment and hear stuff and make an approach that way.”

    Since you had so much success with “Club Classics Volume 1,” did you feel pressure when it came time to follow it up?

    “No, not at all. It was never about any of that.”

    There’s quite a bit of diversity in your music, even within particular albums. How do you decide which tracks to make singles?

    “It’s a combination. During that time we had a great A&R man who was really with me all the time. He translated information into record company language. That was a lot easier to do. But I think it’s usually a combination of me and the A&R person. And of course, different markets choose different stuff.”

    Soul II Soul has always been much more than just a band; what’s the current status of your other projects?

    “Well now we’re set up both in England and the Caribbean, we have studios in both premises. We have 3 recording studios in London, we still have our merchandise and are still quite active writing and producing different acts. Have a label that is transglobal in regards to the Caribbean and to the UK. We’re currently negotiating distribution for America next year. Because I get all my stuff back next year, so we’ll be re-doing a lot of our bits and pieces there. And then hopefully we’ll have someone who will be able to put out stuff out.”

    Have you considered branching out to other types of entertainment?

    “Yes, the idea of film and that side of things has come up. But at the moment I’m happy to have my feet on the ground, we’re still pretty active in the club world, my first love, and that’s what I’ve been concentrating on a lot this year. And obviously with the celebration of our tenth year anniversary it’s been really cool. Plus, my studios in the UK have just had their first #1, which is great.”

    Dance music evolved so quickly; do you always try to keep up with it?

    “Fully. Keeps you young, don’t it? Here I am, right in the pits of it right now. I’ve got a recording studio that people come in and use, you’re at the cutting edge of it all. And at the same time I’m in the clubs most nights of the week, where you’re getting it full-on. ”

    So you’ve left Virgin?

    “Yes, we have. We’re currently negotiating at the moment so I can’t say too much.”

    What was the reason for changing labels?

    “Yes, the contract ran out . 10 years later … It ran out 8 years ago!”

    Did you feel it was time to move on?

    “No doubt, everything has changed so much.”

    It’s been a while since you’ve performed in America . Any plans to come back soon?

    “I know! I’m desperate to get back there! We’ve been made a few offers, so by the end of the year hopefully we will be back!”

    Is it a problem getting everyone together to go on tour?

    “No, not really. Most of the nucleus of your organization are always together anyway. The biggest problem we have is just linking up some of the lead singers, but we usually get by.”


  4. Scanner

    by admin

    For those who haven’t seen you live yet, how do your concerts compare to your recordings?

    ‘Quite different, to be honest. I’m not a jukebox, so I can’t just play…. I don’t make hits, so I couldn’t do that. I’m studio-based a lot of the time: My records are produced in studios with keyboards and samplers and computers and all those kinds of things. I can’t take those on the road, nor do I attempt to duplicate it. So what I do live is really quite different. I generally improvise the set, but around themes, kinds of structures. “I’ve got a tiny sampler, basically I’ve got miniaturize versions of what I have in the studio back home, like a tiny sampler, a tiny keyboard, mini discs, which have split channels on them with different rhythms, textures and everything – and I know what speed they run at. I can MIDI all the other things so they can run at the same speed as the mini disc. So the mini disc could contain a strange abstract texture, with a drum pattern or something, and the keyboard could contain more sounds. So I can do kind of deconstructed versions of the album in a sense.

    “But generally, I rarely play stuff that I’ve released, very rarely try to emulate something I’ve done in the studio. So they’re really different.’

    Have you considered releasing the live material?

    ‘I don’t know. I’m just redesigning a new website, and the friends of mine that I’m working with just made the new Kraftwerk site, which is very analog-looking. On that, what I’m going to be doing is putting a RealAudio stream on there of lots of back catalog and live concerts and that type of thing – because lots of things you can’t buy anymore, or concerts which you’d never be able to hear, or commissions.

    “I work an awful lot on commission now, projects in different countries and mainland Europe, different cities. It would just be great for people to be able to hear this stuff, I think. It’s quite handy, because it’s an opportunity to reinvestigate what somebody’s done, maybe follow the history and see how these processes work live.’

    What made you start up your own label?

    ‘It’s a simple thing – lots of people set up their own labels. I wanted to do it quite professionally. It took over 18 months to get it sorted out. I didn’t want to just release a record, then look for distribution.

    “Working with Beggar’s Banquet here in the States is really good because at least it means there’s a full support network with distribution and everything, moral support and press support – which is really what you need when you work with any label.

    “The biggest problem ever, whether you write, do music, art, photography… it’s about distribution of materials.

    There’s nothing worse than working on projects and then you just can’t get a hold of them. So for me, I grew tired after years of people saying, ‘Wow, I’m interested in your work. Have you released any records?’ And I think, ‘Oh my god, there’s about eight albums if you’re willing to dig through the racks.’ And that doesn’t seem fair. “It’s fine if you live in a city like New York or London. We’re pretty spoiled with the accessibility. If you live anywhere else, it’s very difficult – that’s partly the point. “Also, the point of it is I hear an awful lot of music I think should be heard by more people. Demos I get sent, or collaborations. With the label, we issue three to four artist-led records a year, and then a series of EPs, which are very strange – everything from DJs working with classical music to classical musicians and singers working with pop bands or rock bands. Whatever. Completely free range . It’s not going to be electronic pollution from fringes and things like that, radiators humming, but a whole host of different records.

    “The first record was called ‘Future Pilot AKA,’ which was an artist who used to be in the Soup Dragons. It’s him collaborating with Alan Vega from Suicide, Conershop, Andy Weatherall the DJ, a whole bunch of people. It’s a completely shape-shifting record. We wanted that to be the first release because the label isn’t about a theme. It’s about just trying to move forward somewhere, or sideways, or whatever.’

    Have you considered doing on-line music distribution?

    ‘Not yet. Obviously it will be one consideration with the label. I think it’s really important. I’ve got friends I correspond with in places like Australia and South Africa, and it’s just so difficult for them to actually get a hold of the material. It could be a good opportunity, and to be able to do mail order as well.

    “I want to set lots of what I might call just a vinyl-edition projects. I’m doing a project called Auto Pilota. It’s a series of EPs with different artists. They’re just going to be pressed on 7-inch singles, and like every three months one will come out. Just a modest little series, going out to the people who might be interested in it.’

    Does the business side of you running a label ever get in the way of actually making your own music?

    ‘Yeah, it does understandably take an element away, but I’m working with a team. It’s not just me, which is the important thing. There’s a really good support team here [in America], and back in London I share an office with a woman. We work together on the label. It’s OK. “I do spend a lot of my life, though, doing paperwork. But a lot of that is with the commission work I do: I have to fill out application forms, write out ideas, go to meetings. Half my life seems to be spent going to meetings. But it’s part of the work you take on. It’s a responsibility of the profession.’

    How does your commission work usually come about?

    ‘Generally, most of them come to me. I’m a magnet for the weirdest projects ever. They generally come to me: 90 percent of them do, and the other 10 percent are things I’m interested in and I approach people sayin, ‘Well how do you think this might work?’

    “Usually it has sort of a domino effect: You line them all up, and one knocks into the next one and acts as a catalyst for the next. “I was a professor at Liverpool University last year. I was a visiting professor, and having done that, someone heard me at the university give a talk and asked me to do a project. So I did this project called ‘Surface Noise,’ where I recorded the sounds of Liverpool and made them into this project and then did it in London. And that moved forward to something else and so one. “I just won this award called the Imaginarium 1999 Award, which is a big digital art prize in England, which means not only do I get some money to make a project, but I have an exhibition in the ICA in October. That’s really exciting – perhaps something else will come out of that.

    “But I’m not a pushy kind of person. I have enough to work on, and I’m interested in working on projects to their full extent. I do my best to support anyone who comes to me, like if a student comes to me and says, ‘Can you make music for my film?’ If I can do it, I’ll do it. It’s not about money.’

    How do you decide what projects you want to take on?

    ‘A lot of the work that I’m interested in is connected with the public at large. They’re not projects that go out to a specialized audience. I run a lot of workshops and do lectures at least once a month, trying to act again as some sort of catalyst. Try to kick-start them into something or talk about ideas. “At the moment I’ve been working with an Asian theater company, doing the soundtrack to this play. One of the actresses in the company approached me separately and said, ‘I’m a dancer> I want to do this choreographic piece.’ And I said, ‘Yeah, sure. Let’s try to do something.’ It’s a minimal budget, but it’s important to do it.

    “At the end of the day, I’m not working in the commercial music field, and I don’t need to consider those aspects. Yes, of course I’ve got to make a living, but I think it’s important that you inside are happy with what you do. These projects satisfy me, and I like it because it’s not about disguising what you do within a kind of post-modern text or anything. They’re about accessibility. A record is one thing, but lots of the projects I do are about working with the public.

    “The big project I’m doing for the science museum in London, a big sound project, is about the general public to me. Two million people pass through there a year. You know it’s kids, grannies, mothers. That’s very important to me, opening the doors.’

    Are you aware of anyone who’s been inspired by you and taken elements of your work into new directions?

    ‘It must happen. I couldn’t actually name names. If I could I wouldn’t name names anyway. I’m sure that’s happened. “When I’ve worked with music people, what they’ve done eventually is just start to strip things away. I’m a complete mimnalist with sound; I’m always removing things. When I’ve worked with people I know I’ve had that influence. “Just because you’ve got a 24-track studio does not mean necessarily that you should have 24 tracks playing. You could just have two, and it could work perfectly well.

    “In Europe, there’s a whole stream of electronic music coming out that’s completely stripped down.’

    You’re famous for using sounds picked up on a radio scanner. At what point in the creative process are those integrated into tour music?

    ‘To be honest, it’s about 75-percent improvised. What the scanner does, like any sort of radio device, is pull down these kind of indiscriminate signals. It basically gives you access to a palette of sounds that you or I would not otherwise have access to.

    “As we talk to each other now, we’re surrounded by radio waves. I’m quite romantic in my way, and I love this idea of being able to access those sounds, draw them into a point in time via a live concert or studio and throw them onto the record.

    “When I’m making a record, I always leave the scanner online and I always use a microphone live and leave it outside the window. They run constantly, and sometimes I mix them in, sometimes I don’t. They’re always there, and often you hear tiny parts when it breaks. “On the second track on the CD, you have this long string piece about seven minutes long, but it begins with all these strange noises. But they are, in fact, all just voices, all just scanned voices that have been completely processed. That again is taking the voices and taking it a stage further, trying to do something with them, trying to use the voices themselves as a form of sound language.’

    How long have you been doing music?

    ‘Since about the age of 13 or 14. I started messing around with tape recorders.’

    Do you have any formal training?

    ‘I was forced to play the piano when I was 10 and 11 by my mother – you’re too young to make those kind of decisions by yourself. I was put into different competitions, and I remember winning a bar of chocolate in one of them because I was really bad.

    “But I convinced myself psychologically that I was the winner, but I really don’t think I was. I remember crying afterwards. But I got a bar of chocolate. What the hell? What else could a 10-year-old boy expect? A record contact? But that’s the only training I had.

    “Now, I don’t really mind, I work to the best of my abilities, and I try the best on my records. I cannot make great statements about them. They’re really representative of what Mr. Scanner does at the moment. And if people don’t like them, that’s fine, really. It’s not the end of the world, but I certainly try my best on them.’


  5. Marc Almond

    by admin

    Since this interview is for an on-line magazine, can you tell me your feelings about the Internet?

    Marc: I think it’s fascinating and brilliant, though I have this website and I still haven’t figured out how to access it! It takes me a long time to catch up with technology, and I’m very dyslexic. I find it very hard to really work the ‘Net. I’m still kind of finding my way around it in a lot of ways.

    But I think it’s brilliant. I’ve been able to get information out to so many people and hear responses from so many people as well. It’s a wonderful way for people to know what I’m doing. It’s great the way you can bypass the record company, getting it right out to people, letting them see what’s happening. So I love it.

    What do you think about actually selling/distributing music on-line?

    Marc: I don’t like it. Because I think it’s fine, the whole thing of maybe doingsomething special, downloading some music. But I think the joy of music is… people actually, like, going out to record shops, to CD shops, and looking for music. That to me is the joy, looking through the racks, finding something new. Having your money and parting with it for something you can tangibly hold. People like that. We’re a consumerists society. People like going and spending money and buying things.

    The web is fantastic, but it’s not great if we become a society where we can’t communicate and interact with each other. I don’t think it will ever take over going out and the joy of actually saying, “I have some money. I’m going to look for some records to buy, or some CDs.” People love that.

    How have things been working out with your own label?

    Marc: This is the first record I’ve done under my own label. For me, it’s great. It’s given me a whole new energy. It’s given me the control over what I want to do.

    I’ve had so much experience with major labels over the years, 16 or 17 years. All of them ended with disenchantment, really. So many people have their agendas of what they want you do to, how they want you to sound. All that gearing toward having hit records.

    To sell your album you have to have a chart hit. We don’t really need to do that so much anymore. Artists who’ve been around for a long time, I think, are taking much more control over their own careers. Being able to get directly to people.

    I never say, “never.” In the right circumstances, maybe I would work with a major label again, but I like to have this freedom. If I decide I want to do a one-off dance track or something, I can do that and make it available. If I want to do an experimental, limited-edition EP, I can do that. I don’t have to go to my record label and say, “I want to do this EP,” and have them go, “Well, it doesn’t really fit into our schedule for your new album.

    Does having to finance all the recording yourself have any impact on the way you work?

    Marc: I have to say I was very lucky with this record. It was originally recorded for a label, and the label collapsed and went into a state of flux. They changed all their personnel and everything.

    And I was signed for a second and third album to this label, and I went and said, “If you let me go with my album, with all my tapes and everything, then you don’t have to sign me for a second album. Just let me go with this. Let’s call it quits.” And they did that, so I was able to start my label with a finished album.

    Maybe a lot of artists wouldn’t be fortunate enough to do that, but I was able to. It gave me a starting point. I had a finished, high-quality album.

    How did the collaborations with Siouxsie Sioux and Kelli from the Sneaker Pimps come about?

    Marc: Siouxsie and I had been friends for a long time, and I’d always wanted to do a song with her. And it’s taken 20 years to find the opportunity and the right song to do with her. I just asked her. and she said yes she liked the song.

    The Creatures have also got their own label now. We’ve been sharing a lot of similar experiences. That’s how that happened, really.

    And with Kelli of the Sneaker Pimps I just loved the Sneaker Pimps album a lot, and I had the song “Almost Diamonds,” and I just contacted her. I really wanted to originally do a collaboration with the Sneaker Pimps, but by the time I spoke to Kelli, she’d left the band. It was the voice I really loved on the record, so that’s how that happened, really.

    What’s the status your current work with David Ball?

    Marc: There may be a Soft Cell album, if we can come up with something that we’re happy with. I mean Dave and I have always remained friends; there’s never been any animosity between us.

    Soft Cell didn’t so much split as kind of burn out in a way. We were burnt out in a short amount of time. The pressures by the organization that was around us were so bad, it really disillusioned us very, very quickly.

    But we’ve always remained friends and have always hoped to one day do a project together. But neither of us are interested in being part of a whole retro scene. A certain amount of that is inevitable, because people are so obsessed with retro at the moment as we’re approaching the millennium, and everyone’s sort of reappraising the last 30 to 40 years of music and rediscovering it, repackaging it, reselling it and re-listening to it. Going “Hey, weren’t the ’80s good, and weren’t the ’70s good?” That’s just the times that we live in.

    But I think it’s important for us that we do a brand-new album, something that we’re excited about, and not the album that we didn’t do in 1986. So far we’re recorded and rejected about nine songs. So we have to see how it goes.

    Based on the work you’ve both done since the last Soft Cell album, and current music that you like, how would you like to see the new Soft Cell material turn out?

    Marc: Well, I think it will be a dance-oriented album. Dave’s very much remained in the dance field throughout the years. And I like dance music as well, but there’s not a lot of dance tracks on this album ["Open All Night"].

    I still like working with dance music sometimes. If I do any more collaborations I’d like to work with some interesting dance music people. I love the underground house stuff. I like the electonica stuff. And some of that really comes from where we started in the first place, with the early Soft Cell stuff. So I think it will be more of a dance-oriented project than say, maybe my own solo stuff.

    Soft Cell had such a unique sound. What things to do think originally helped shape it?

    Marc: I think that we were influenced very much by punk. We were influenced by the early garage-electronic sounds that were happening in the north of England � bands like Cabaret Voltaire and very early Human League. We were influenced by what was happening New York-wise with bands like Suicide � they were a really big influence, I think. Everything was played live.

    We were using a combination of Dave’s Korg synthesizers and drum machines, very old analog equipment, and we were using Synclaviers as well. A mix of the warm Synclavier sounds with Dave’s analog garage sounds. Every bass line was played live. I just think it was a unique sound, the blend of his synthesized sounds, which seemed to have almost a rock ‘n’ roll and soulful edge, and my vocals made a very original sound. “Tainted Love” today still sounds like a very original record, and those albums, the three albums that we did, still sound really good. I think no one else was doing what we were doing, electronic music in the way that we were doing it. We were very much original, very much originators. And I don’t think anyone’s really sounded like us since.

    While you have a large following, in America especially, you’re still best known to many people for “Tainted Love,” your first big hit. How do you feel about that?

    Marc: I think you just have to learn to deal with it, really. In America, for the past 10 years, it’s been difficult, not having the support of a record company or manager to bring me over here to do promotion. So when you haven’t got a record company giving you support, you can’t come over and play live. People can’t catch up with what you’re doing.

    Even though when I did the “Stars We Are” album � that was really successful here, that did really well. But my record company and manager wanted to concentrate on me in the European market. They thought I was more of a European performer, even though I was already established in Europe. People know me there for a wide range of work.

    It only seems to be in America that I get the “Tainted Love” thing. It’s something you’ve just got a deal with. People like it. You’ve really got to face and embrace your past. You can’t run away from it. You have to deal with it. But I think there’s enough fans who know the body of work that I’ve done.

    Even in Britain, it seemed like “Stars We Are” was a break-through for you, in terms of being seriously accepted as a solo artist.

    Marc: I think there’s always that…. When you’re in a successful band and you become a solo artist, people feel kind of resentful of you at first for going solo. And they feel suspicious and are like, “Well, you had your chance with a band. Why should we like you as a solo artist?”

    And it did take me a long time to really establish myself as a solo artist, to have the recognition, to have the success. When I split with Soft Cell, I didn’t go out and play a Soft Cell song for 10 years. I decided to do it the hard way, maybe committing commercial suicide and shooting myself in the foot. But for me, I liked the danger of that, the challenge. And after 10 years, I started to put Soft Cell songs back into my set, and I do play Soft Cell songs now.

    But I thought I had to reestablish myself the hard way, go out and pay my dues. And thankfully now, in Europe and Britain, I do have a lot of respect as a solo artist. But I had to work for that.

    Do you tend to have a clear idea of how you want an album to turn out when you start work on it?

    Marc: Sometimes I have an idea, a clear vision. You can usually tell the albums I’ve had a clear vision on, and sometimes I’m just throwing things at the wall, hoping they’ll work out. Things like “Fantastic Star,� the last album � it was an artist losing direction, really, going off in all kinds of directions. It was an album recorded over four years with two different producers in two countries over two record labels with four A&R men and four different song writers. So it was bound to be a bit eclectic. I look at it as being an interesting compilation album in a way!

    But now, with the new album, I had a very clear idea of how I wanted it to sound. And I thought it was important to do an album that could be listened to as one body of work, as one atmosphere, as one sound.

    Also finding a new voice, I think, on this album. Less of the dramatics, less of the melodrama and big vocals. Something that’s more intimate and introspective and passionate.

    Throughout my career, there’s been things that didn’t really turn out the way I wanted them to, things like “Vermin In Ermine” my first solo album, and “Stories of Johnny.” I was still finding my feet, still experimenting. I think that’s important. I’ve always got to experiment as well, be prepared to take a risk.

    It what ways have you seen the music industry change since your time with Soft Cell?

    Marc: Artists don’t last very long. A lot of artists, they have an album and they have a few years, and then people don’t seem to be as interested in their second album. Its like they have their moment in their sun. They have their 15 minutes or whatever.

    A lot of acts, not all of them, don’t last. Because there’s always something new coming along, and there’s always the new version of the new band being heard the year before, whereas it used to be “Here is a new David Bowie,” or this person or that person.

    Now it’s like the new version of the band you just heard the year before. It’s very much music recycling itself. It’s just this generation kind of wants more now, quickly and quickly, and have less of an attention span.

    So acts don’t last, unless their particularly talented and particularly clever – bands who kind of reinvent themselves and are good at coming up with something new. Bands like Blur have lasted. They’ve come up with something different for every album.

    There’s very few bands that really last now, it’s become a quick-fix society.

    In terms of material, what can we expect from the upcoming U.S. tour?

    Marc: It’s very difficult because in England and Europe whenever an album’s come out I’ve toured and kept up with my various phases. So when I have a new album, people don’t expect a show of old songs because they know the style of my new album and I’ll do songs that fit into that world.

    But when I come here, I’ll probably do a show in two halves. The first half of the show I’d do a lot of my new album and songs that fit into that world, maybe Marc and the Mambas stuff. The second half I’ll play a selection of older stuff that maybe people haven’t heard for a while, a few more electronic songs, a bit more of a varied show than I’ve been doing in Britain.

    But it’s important to tell people how you are now as an artist, make it quite clear that this is what I’m doing now, this is what I sound like now. And if people listen to that, then you can say, “Well, here’s some of the old songs you haven’t heard for a while.

    Within the gothic and industrial community, you can still see Soft Cell’s influence in terms of look. How do you feel about that?

    Marc: I don’t mind. New generations of people come along and have liked us, the sound and the look. I think it’s fine. It was obviously a strong image, and it stayed in people’s minds. Groups of young people have rediscovered it. So I think that’s fine.

    What do you think of the current crop of pop bands, compared to what was going on at the time of Soft Cell?

    Marc: There were a lot of strong bands with strong identities in the ’80s. It was a time for stars, pop stars, and a lot of those bands had very original sound and original front men, original singers. Their videos were very striking. It was the first time people were starting to use video. There was a lot of originality there, and people are going back and listening to it because they feel very unsatisfied with a lot of the current music.

    People who are fronting the bands [now] just don’t really have the magnetism and personality.

    What did you think of Nine Inch Nail’s cover of the Soft Cell song “Memorabilia”?

    Marc: “I love NIN. I’m a big fan. I thought it was great the way he kind of de-constructed it. I was really pleased that he did that.

    Whatever happened to Cindy Ecstasy?

    Marc: She had a band called Six Said Red, and that was, like, 1984. I don’t know what became of her after that.

    Someone told me that she had a guest house in some seaside town in Britain somewhere, that she’s running a hotel. But I have no idea!

    So she was actually the one who introduced you to the drug Ecstasy?

    Marc: She was the person who really turned everybody on first of all to the Ecstasy thing. That was her name, where the name came from. Of course, her real name remains protected! That was 1981, and nobody was doing that drug then.

    It was very much an influence on what we were doing with Soft Cell. We recorded our first couple of albums under the influence of that drug. I went back to Britain, and no one had heard of it at all.

    It wasn’t until 1984 that I saw the first mention of it in the British papers, and they were thinking of making it a Class A drug. Now it’s such a drug culture in Britain, people’s grandmothers are taking it.

    In what ways did it impact your music?

    Marc : The whole dance feel maybe came of Ecstasy, and maybe some psychedelic touches as well. New experimentations with sounds and things.

    But at the same time, it’s a drug that came make things sound a lot better than they actually do sound! I’d take that drug and listened to albums and thought I had to run out and buy them the next day. And it never quite sounded the same again!

    There’s a danger when you’re listening to things in the studio – maybe you weren’t being such a good judge of things after all.

    The last band I interviewed, Hardknox, wanted to know, how are you able to always sound so romantic?

    Marc: Because I like to think I’m a romantic person. I think I’m a person of paradox, actually. Because there’s a side of me that’s quite cynical, and I like irony, but in a nice kind of way, a humorous kind of way.

    But at the same time, I do believe there’s romance in the world. I do like romance. But I like to be ironic.

    While I’m being romantic, there’s a sting in my romance. A dark romantic, a dark side. I like to seduce people with sweetness and then give them a shot of poison. That’s my kind of romance.


  6. Hugh Cornwell

    by admin

    The following is an interview with former Stranglers frontman Hugh Cornwell. On February 23rd 1999, Hugh released a new album in America, “Black Hair, Black Eyes, Black Suit.” It’s a slightly different version of the album that came out in Europe under the name “Guilty.” This interview was conducted while Hugh we out on a short “Plugged & Unplugged” solo tour of the US. Hugh is planning on returning to this counry in late July / early August. For the latest information, be sure to check out http://www.hughcornwell.com/.

    When did your website start up?

    “It’s been up for about 18 months. This massively enthusiastic fan rang us up and said ‘have you got a web site?’ And we said, no we haven’t. So he said ‘would you like one?’ And we thought it was going to cost a fortune. And he said he’d do it just because he was really into what I’m doing. That’s what he’s done and everyone is saying it’s amazing.”

    How involved are you with it?

    “Quite intimately. He’s speaking with my manager David three or four times a week. So it’s instantaniously up to date, updated about three times a week, which is good. And I’ve done exclusive interviews with him, and if i’m doing a new project I go over it with him. It’s funny because he’s not doing it to be paid, he’s happy to be the first to find out things. Which is really nice. He’s a lovely bloke.”

    Have you considered releasing music over the internet?

    “Of course, why not? I’ve just finished a project with a poet. It’s music that I’ve done being put to his poems. He’s reciting the poems. And I’ve made them sort of structured like songs, but with no singing, just spoken word. It’s very psychedelic and we’re all really happy with it. But we’re not sure whether that might be the way forward, to put it through the web. Because it is a sideline. It’s not my next record or anything, but it’s a great little project, and that could possibly be the best way to make it available to people.”

    It’s been a while since you toured America. How does it feel to be back?

    “Bloody marvelous. I came in today. I was last here in 1990, but I wasn’t even playing. I came over to do some promotion for the last Stranglers album I made, which was 10. So I haven’t been here since 1990. 9 years!”

    Why did you chose to do it by youself, rather than with a band?

    “Well, I’ve got a band together now. It’s none of the players that were on the album, but they’ve obviously learned most of the songs on the record. I’ve had them with me for about a year now, and I’ve just done 2 weeks with them in the UK and it was really jamming. We’re going to come over, but we thought it would make more sense at this stage, as the album’s just come out here, for me to just come by myself to do interviews and I can do these solo gigs with very little organization. Just show people that I am foremost a songwriter, and I can perform in a group or outside of a group. These gigs are unplugged and plugged. If you just go acoustic, people start thinking your a folk artist, and I’m not. It’s a nice way to showcase the songs, and everyone can hear the lyrics when you do this sort of a gig. So sometimes lyrics come through that they might not hear on the record or with a group. You actually get to know the songs quite well through this situation. We have to come back with the band in the summer.”

    You’ve had quite a long career – what material have you chosen to do on this tour?

    “A complete cross section. The Strangler songs that I’ve picked are ones that I put a lot of input in. Either I wrote the whole song myself, or I felt that I put a lot of input into the song. It’s quite a lot, about 40% is Stranglers songs. There’s even some songs from ‘Nosferato’ that I made with Robert Williams in 1979. The band and I have actually learned some of these songs where the arrangements are a nightmare, one of them took three days to learn. It’s all 5/4, 7/4, 4/4, 3/4 timing. There’s a lot of overdubs on the drumming, and it took the drummer a long time to work out parts that could be played live. So I’m doing some of that as well now, by myself. And I’m obviously concentrating on the ‘Black Hair..’ album. And then I’m also … for my indulgence, playing some new songs which are going to be on my next album. 3 or 4. It gives me a chance to get to know them and hone them a bit. I’ve actually got crib sheets for the lyrics, because I haven’t learned those lyrics yet. It’s very exciting to get the opportunity to let people hear some stuff from the future. They’ve been going over really well. People like them on first hearing … you could never get that reaction with a band, I think. It’s just that it’s a guitar and voice, it seems to be easier to latch onto new things in that way. ”

    What have the audience been like? Do you find it mostly old fans, or people just now discovering you?

    “About 50/50 actually. A while ago, when this record first came out in the UK, I was getting a lot of people …. for years now, i’ve been having a lot of people shout out old Stranglers song titles. And now, in the last few months, I’ve had people shouting out the names of songs off ‘Black Hair.’ So it’s very exciting for me. Because I have a lot of ambition left. I want to reach at least at least the success that the stranglers had by myself. And even then, the Stranglers at their height never had world domination. I’m a megalomaniac, I just want to sell truckloads of records and dominate the world.”

    Do you get people shouting out any Stranglers songs that you don’t want to do?

    “Well, the reason I might choose not to do them live … well, with Stranglers songs it’s easy. It’s either a song that I didn’t have much input into, or it’s I can’t work out an arrangement that suits the song. I mean I don’t do ‘Golden Brown’ live because it’s a keyboard based song. I worked out the chords, but it doesn’t come alive like it does with a keyboard. So it’s easy to avoid those songs. Most of the new tracks on ‘Black Hair’ I can do by myself, they’re guitar based.”

    “Black Hair…” originally came on in England under a different name. What’s the story behind that?

    “Well, we made the record in 1996. I didn’t want to be dictated to by a record company’s musical taste. So rather than sign to a record label and have to take in tapes of songs and have people saying we like this one, we don’t like this, I decided to get together with Laurie Latham, the producer, and my manager David, my manager, and the three of us would make a record that we liked. And once we made a record we liked, then we’d go and find someone that like that record. We thought that was a much better way of approaching making the record. I like that i’m in a position now where I can do that, as I’ve got my own studio. So that’s exactly what we did, we spent the whole on ’96 making that record. It came out in the fall of ’97 in the UK and Europe. And then Vel Vel got to hear it, and it’s take this long for it to come out. It was due to come out last summer on Vel Vel, but its been put back twice. That’s fine by me, I wanted it to come out at the right time. It’s just finally come out this past February. And the reason why it has a different title is because … this is record companies for you … as soon as the English record company found out that Vel Vel was going to release it here, they tried to flood America with imports of the UK version. So we managed to get that stopped, so with that in mind we decided that it should really be changed to make it distinct from the UK version. We’ve actually changed quite a bit of it. We’ve taken one track off, the weakest track we had on it, and put two new tracks on, which were from those sessions and are very strong songs that we didn’t think were right for the UK market. ‘Jesus Will Weep’ is a very strong ballad, we left that off, and ‘Not Hungry Enough’ as well. So I think that it was just an astute decision, it wasn’t done to make people buy it twice. It was just done to make a difference

    Were you frustrated by the delay of the US release?

    “Well, of course. But when you’re a creative person, especially in music, things never happen fast enough. you’re always frustrated, things always take five times as long as you want them to take. But i’ve got a very philosophical view of life now, i just accept the way the card fall. It’s just whatever’s meant to be is meant to be. As long as i’m happy with what i’ve done, as long as i’m proud of what i’ve done, then I’m quite happy with whatever takes place in it’s own time.”

    What was the creative process like making this album?

    “The way we approached this record, and it really worked and i want to continue working like this next time ….the people played on it, i’d been out and doing concerts for about 18 months. About 1/2 of the album we’d been playing live. So we built up sort of a playing rapore, between the four of us. So we would go in and play as an ensemble, together, and get a good backing track, the drums and bass. And when we were happy with a good backing track, then the rest would be taken off to my studio and we had limitless time to finish it. It’s rather like an artist doing a charcoal sketch on an easel, then when he’s happy with that he gets the paint out and starts trying the different paints. You’ve got your structure, and then you can do whatever you want to it, as long as the structure’s right. So I would be in the studio with Laurie Latham, the producer, we were in there 5 days a week, Monday through Friday, very regimented, and would spend 10 hours a day, just the two of us, trying anything. Guitars, sometimes keyboards, just trying out musical ideas and vocal ideas. We would just do it until we were happy with what we had done. Sometimes we tried things that didn’t work, or the sound was wrong, there was no pressure and we had such fun. We were laughing everyday. And there was this great element of spontaneity about it, too. Because we knew the arrangement was there, but only for the backing track, and the rest was totally open to whatever worked. So all the time i was trying new things. At the end of the day, we’d just listen to what we had done and go ‘oh my god, when we walked in here this morning i had no idea it would turn out like this’ and I love that spontaneity in the studio, it’s so much better. In a group situation, you might go on the road and work out a new song to get it so you can go in the studio with it. And when you go in the studio with it, everyone’s got their parts and they’re all fixed. There so in their heads fixed because they’ve been playing them live that there’s no element of change. Where as this way, you’ve got that, you’ve worked on the arrangement, but what goes on it is something completely different.,

    What type of feedback have you received from long-time fans?

    “Well, a lot of people have said that it sounds like a Stranglers album. And a lot of people have said that it sound like the next record on from “Aural Sculpture”, which is funny because ‘Aural Sculpture’ is the last record that my producer did with The Stranglers. They definitely have picked up the similarity in sound between the two, which is quite funny. They say it without realizing it’s the same producer. Of people familiar with The Stranglers, that’s what people are saying. I mean, it’s bound to sound like The Stranglers because it’s the same guitar playing, it’s the same voice and a lot of the song writing is the same, too. It’s quite a hefty chunk of the material.”

    Why did you leave The Stranglers?

    “I just got bored. The work in the studio was in the doldrums. The drummer was using a drum machine the whole time, you couldn’t get him to play live drums in the studio. And I hear he’s still doing that. People going in and recording their bits at different times, so it just wasn’t really an organic unit any more. I just felt that it was time to assert my personality. I didn’t feel that I was rattling the cage enough. Because whenever you’re in a group situation with other people … The Stranglers were four very strong personalities and so our group identity is based on the combination of those four people. So no one is , hopefully, expressed through the group identity, and I just had enough of that. I wanted to be myself.”

    How does doing a solo album now compare to the solo work you did while in The Stranglers?

    “A completely different situation. Because when you’re doing it within a successful group situation, that has a career, it’s always got this tinge of ‘what i did in my holidays’ and I think that its approached as such my the media and journalists in general. It’s a side line, and it’s bound to be. When you do it and you’re not in a group, it’s distinctly different. You’re taken much more seriously.”

    Beavis and Butthead were watching The Stranglers “Skin Deep” video and really, really hated it. How do you feel about that?

    “They really, really hated it? Good! Great! As long as it’s extreme, I don’t mind. It’s in the middle where I’m not very happy.”

    When can we expect another album?

    “Well, I want to record it in the autumn. I can’t wait to get in. I’ve already spoke to Laurie about it. We’re blocking off some time in the fall. I think it should be out by late Spring of 2000.”

    What are you listening to now?

    “I’m listening to a lot of bee bop jazz, Art Blakey, Thelonius Monk, , Nat Adly, all that stuff. but also i’m still rediscovering stuff. Some of my favorites .. what happens with me is that i go into a cd store to look for something new, and i end up coming out with one of my old favorites that i find and buy on cd. I end up rediscovering all the things i listened to when i was forming my musical opinions. So i’m listening to Love at the moment, i think art blue’s an absolute genius. And unfortunately in the 90′s i haven’t heard much. I think song writing has completely fallen by the wayside. there’s so little decent song writing. The music seems to be there, but maybe it’s just standards of education or something. The wordplay just isn’t there. think back to The Doors, Jim Morrison. You could read his lyrics separately, and it would be like a poem. it didn’t matter if they have music or not. What’s happened to these values? Most songs now, if you listen to the music and read the lyrics apart, it’s just pointless. There’s no art, no craft. So I feel in way a bit pioneering, because this is what I champion, this is what i started doing professional with The Stranglers anyway. Song writing in the 70′s wasn’t that good and I thought I’m sure I can do better than this.”